This week, we talked about the 1968 Borko article $Information science: What is it?$ and Henry’s $Influential evaluations$. The first article was an attempt at identifying exactly what information science is while the second article described evaluations as a type if research method.
I liked the evaluations article more than I thought I would. As I started to read it, I couldn$t help but think that this material seemed more appropriate for Public Health than for Information Science (should I capitalize them???? I will$) The article discussed three ways that evaluations could be used: to identify the public good, to chart a course of action, and to modify a course of action. By looking at research and evaluating it, researchers are able to do these things. The part I will always remember about the article is that it referenced Stephen Glass’s article about D.A.R.E. in New Republic and yet we know that story contained material he just made up. Oh, and the Henry article was written in 2003 and Glass’s article was from 1997, the year he was busted.
...