@RectorSun @dennisthecynic I hope residents outnumber city people though and that everything is super transparent (as stated) π 1 π 0 Original URL
Tweets
@RectorSun @dennisthecynic Including at-large reps is a good idea. Thatβs what I was hoping for on top of assoc reps and city reps. π 1 π 0 Original URL
Dear #HCI and #HCIL peeps. I have 5000+ zip code entries and need to find the best way to visualize them. Any suggestions? π 0 π 0 Original URL
WYPR (with a quote by the lovely Ann Walsh) takes @recnparks to task 10-3-12: Patterson Parking http://www.wypr.org/podcast/10-3-12-patterson-parking#.UGyEne7pcR4.twitter #dontpavethepark π 2 π 1 Original URL
@RecNParks βOver half of the community park users feel that automobile parking should be reduced or eliminated in the park."#dontpavethepark π 0 π 0 Original URL
RT @deliriumdog: Retweet if youβre a fan of things that make you retweet tweets. π 0 π 0 Original URL
.@RecNParks The 1998 PP plan specificly says > 50% residents want no cars in park on pg 22. Donβt distort 4th objective #dontpavethepark π 3 π 0 Original URL
@JeffTrulick I was told they werenβt sure who would be on it and it would be small. Just want the city to know that residents want on it.. π 0 π 0 Original URL
@gxwalsh I was told they werenβt sure who would be on it and it would be small. Just want the city to know that residents want on itβ¦ π 1 π 0 Original URL
Let me rephrase: if you think regular residents should be part of Patterson Park working group, retweet this #dontpavethepark π 4 π 1 Original URL